<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffcc" text="#000000">
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<img alt="" src="cid:part1.02000707.02060501@pfli.org" height="137"
width="887"><br>
<font color="#3333ff"><b><big><big><font face="Calisto MT">PharmFacts
E-News Update -- 16 Nov 2009 AD<br>
</font></big></big></b></font><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial;"><font size="3"><font
color="#990000"><strong>This daily e-newsletter is only possible
through the generous gifts of our readers and supporters. Please help
us continue to fight for the defense of babies by donating
today!</strong></font><strong> </strong><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.pfli.org/shop/index1.html"><strong>Click
here</strong></a><strong><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.pfli.org/shop/index1.html">
</a><font color="#990000">to
help or to renew your dues online TODAY!</font></strong></font></span><br>
<font color="#3333ff"><big><big><font face="Calisto MT"><small><small><font
color="#000000"><br>
>From ALL, 11/16/09:<br>
<br>
</font></small></small></font></big></big></font><strong>The Affordable
Health Care for America Act (H.R.
3962) and the Stupak Amendment</strong><br>
<br>
Let us first be clear
about what existed in federal law prior to recent discussions
on national health care reform or any bills proposed to enact
such a program and what they did or did not contain in the way of
provisions for abortion.
<p jquery1258392831859="69" jquery1258119665334="69"
jquery1258074943308="69" jquery1258073895467="69"
jquery1258072894702="69" align="left">The Hyde Amendment, named after
its chief sponsor Congressman
Henry Hyde of Illinois, passed on September 30, 1976 in the U.S. House
of
Representatives (207-167) as a response to the Supreme Court’s 1973
<em>Roe v. Wade</em> decision decriminalizing abortion. It is a
limitation amendment barring the use of federal funds to pay for
abortions
through funds allocated by the annual appropriations bill for the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. </p>
<p jquery1258392831859="70" jquery1258119665334="70"
jquery1258074943308="70" jquery1258073895467="70"
jquery1258072894702="70" align="left">Contrary to popular belief, the
Hyde Amendment does not ban
all federal funding for abortion; it only bans funds in
HHS appropriations from being used for that
purpose. Further, it makes exceptions for cases of rape, incest
and the life of the mother” (although precise wording varies from
year to year as the amendment is renewed).</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="71" jquery1258119665334="71"
jquery1258074943308="71" jquery1258073895467="71"
jquery1258072894702="71" align="left">As we are all aware, recent
versions of legislation
designed to establish and implement a national health care system have
included provisions for taxpayer-funded abortion as well as mandates
that
at least some private insurance plans include abortion coverage. House
bills specifically included it, House Democrats promoted
it, Senate Democrats admitted it, Senate Democrats refused to ban
it, the mainstream media confirmed it and every amendment to exclude it
was
defeated.</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="72" jquery1258119665334="72"
jquery1258074943308="72" jquery1258073895467="72"
jquery1258072894702="72" align="left">Enter the Stupak Amendment. The
Stupak Amendment reads as
follows (Sec. 265):</p>
<blockquote>
<p jquery1258392831859="73" jquery1258119665334="73"
jquery1258074943308="73" jquery1258073895467="73"
jquery1258072894702="73" align="left">Limitation on Abortion Funding
(a) in General – No funds
authorized or appropriated by the Act (or an amendment made by this
Act)
may be used to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs
of
any health plan that includes coverage of abortion, except in the case
where a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or
physical illness that would, as certified by a physician, place the
woman
in danger of death unless an abortion is performed, including a
life-endangering physical condition cause by or arising from the
pregnancy
itself, or unless the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or
incest.</p>
</blockquote>
<p jquery1258392831859="74" jquery1258119665334="74"
jquery1258074943308="74" jquery1258073895467="74"
jquery1258072894702="74" align="left">The Stupak Amendment does indeed
prohibit <em>some</em>
abortion funding. Specifically, it prohibits federal funding of
abortion under the public option (the federal government’s insurance
plan administered by HHS) – except in cases of rape, incest and
“life of the mother.” The Stupak Amendment, in essence,
follows the same (flawed) model as the Hyde Amendment by restricting
some
federally funded abortions in a particular segment of the federal
budget.</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="75" jquery1258119665334="75"
jquery1258074943308="75" jquery1258073895467="75"
jquery1258072894702="75" align="left">However, when one reviews the
national health care bill and
all of its provisions, it is clear that the Stupak Amendment fell far
short
of even maintaining the “status quo.” What has been widely
proclaimed as a “victory” for the pro-life movement fails to
prohibit the following:</p>
<blockquote>
<p jquery1258392831859="76" jquery1258119665334="76"
jquery1258074943308="76" jquery1258073895467="76"
jquery1258072894702="76" align="left">1. Abortions are covered through
private
plans - Section 304 of the Affordable Health Care for America Act
requires private insurance companies that desire to participate in the
exchange (government plan) to contract with abortionists, thereby
protecting abortionists from “discrimination.” The bill
also requires the existence of at least one insurance plan that covers
abortion "services" in each state. Tax dollars may not fund abortions
under private insurance, but those private plan participants are paying
for
abortion through their premiums. The Stupak Amendment does not address
any of these concerns.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p jquery1258392831859="77" jquery1258119665334="77"
jquery1258074943308="77" jquery1258073895467="77"
jquery1258072894702="78" align="left">2. Federally funded abortions
under other agencies and
future repeal of amendments - Section 222 of the bill prohibits the
expenditure of federal funds for abortion provided only through
HHS. Additionally, it provides that when the national health care
program takes effect in 2012, existing laws in effect six months prior
will
determine the boundaries of enactment. In other words, if Congress is
able to repeal the Hyde or Stupak Amendments prohibiting tax-funded
abortion, then federal funding for abortion will go into effect. The
Stupak
Amendment does not address any of these concerns.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p jquery1258392831859="78" jquery1258119665334="78"
jquery1258074943308="78" jquery1258073895467="78"
jquery1258072894702="80" align="left">3. <b>Violations of conscience
protection</b> - <b><font color="#ff0000">Under
Section 258, conscience protection for pro-life physicians and
pharmacists
will not be honored or provided. The Obama administration has opposed
conscience protection for health workers from the very beginning. By
excluding this protection from the health care bill, doctors, nurses,
pharmacists and other health workers are at the mercy of Health and
Human
Services. The Stupak Amendment does not address any of these
concerns.</font></b></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p jquery1258392831859="79" jquery1258119665334="79"
jquery1258074943308="79" jquery1258073895467="79"
jquery1258072894702="83" align="left">4. Contraception - Under
Sections 1714 and 1920, "family
planning" services will be offered through government-run health care
options. </p>
<p jquery1258392831859="80" jquery1258119665334="80"
jquery1258074943308="80" jquery1258073895467="80"
jquery1258072894702="84" align="left">5. Healthy Teen Initiative to
Prevent Teen Pregnancy
Program - Under Section 2526 of the bill, teenage girls will be
provided
with "family planning" services through a government-run health care
scheme.</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="81" jquery1258119665334="81"
jquery1258074943308="81" jquery1258073895467="81"
jquery1258072894702="85" align="left"><b>Planned Parenthood is
currently the largest recipient of
government “family planning” dollars and is the perfect example
of the “family planning setting” referred to in
section 1714. "Family planning" services commonly refer to
abortion, birth control and [abortifacient] emergency contraception.
Planned Parenthood sex
education includes sexuality indoctrination for children as young as
five, indoctrination into homosexual lifestyles and
indoctrination into the use of abortion and birth control, as clearly
described in Planned Parenthood teen outreach sites such as
TakeCareDownThere.com and TeenTalk.</b></p>
<p jquery1258392831859="82" jquery1258119665334="82"
jquery1258074943308="82" jquery1258073895467="82"
jquery1258072894702="86" align="left">International Planned Parenthood
Federation’s recent
"sexual rights" declaration clearly outlines organizational goals and
policies that include tax-funded abortion on demand, granting children
autonomous rights to sexual pleasure according to their
“capacity” and allowing child predators to conceal past
criminal sexual history.</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="83" jquery1258119665334="83"
jquery1258074943308="83" jquery1258073895467="83"
jquery1258072894702="87" align="left">The “comprehensive, fact-based
sex education”
referred to in Section 2526 of the House "health care reform"
bill precludes abstinence-based education.</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="84" jquery1258119665334="84"
jquery1258074943308="84" jquery1258073895467="84"
jquery1258072894702="88" align="left">The Stupak Amendment does not
address any of these
concerns.</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="85" jquery1258119665334="85"
jquery1258074943308="85" jquery1258073895467="85"
jquery1258072894702="89" align="left">6. Provisions for euthanasia and
physician-assisted
suicide, including the withdrawal of medical care - Section 240 of the
bill prohibits “option suicide, assisted suicide, euthanasia, or
mercy killing, regardless of legality.” However, “nothing
in [the previous] paragraph (1) shall be construed to apply to or
affect
any option to – (A) withhold or withdraw of medical treatment of
medical care.”</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="86" jquery1258119665334="86"
jquery1258074943308="86" jquery1258073895467="86"
jquery1258072894702="90" align="left">The Stupak Amendment makes no
mention of H.R. 3962’s
redefinition of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. The bill’s
provisions for advance care planning consultation outlines that
dehydration
and starvation are not to be considered euthanasia, assisted suicide or
mercy killing. By excluding denial of food and water as means of
euthanasia, the bill specifically allows for cases like that of Terri
Schiavo.</p>
</blockquote>
<p jquery1258392831859="87" jquery1258119665334="87"
jquery1258074943308="87" jquery1258073895467="87"
jquery1258072894702="91" align="left">The Stupak Amendment does not
respect the personhood and
innate dignity of every human being. The Stupak Amendment only
addresses federal funding of surgical abortion under HHS appropriations
and
allows several exceptions. It contains no specific provisions
prohibiting rationed health care, euthanasia, assisted suicide,
<b>abortifacient contraception</b>, pornographic sex education,
expanded funding
of Planned Parenthood, in vitro fertilization, human embryonic stem
cell
research or therapy and the like. The Stupak Amendment hardly puts a
dent
in an otherwise massively dangerous bill.</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="88" jquery1258119665334="88"
jquery1258074943308="88" jquery1258073895467="88"
jquery1258072894702="92" align="left">The Stupak Amendment led to
passage of H.R. 3962. “The
House narrowly passed its version of health care reform late Saturday
with
a 220-215 vote with 39 Democrats opposing it. Passage came after House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi reluctantly made concessions to Stupak and other
Democratic opponents of abortion.” (FOX News)</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="89" jquery1258119665334="89"
jquery1258074943308="89" jquery1258073895467="89"
jquery1258072894702="93" align="left"><u>Was the Stupak Amendment a
victory for pro-lifers?<br>
</u>No! Passage of H.R. 3962 was a crushing blow to the pro-life
movement and to the millions of human lives now at risk because of it.
In
fact, it hurt the pro-life movement by including several
abortion-enabling
provisions to be transmitted as “compromise” to the U. S.
Senate.</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="90" jquery1258119665334="90"
jquery1258074943308="90" jquery1258073895467="90"
jquery1258072894702="94" align="left"><u>What was the role of the
National Right to Life Committee
and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in passing H.R. 3962?<br>
</u>Working in tandem, both NRLC and the USCCB actually enabled the
agenda of the abortion lobby. On Saturday, November 7, the NRLC sent
a letter to each member of Congress noting that the NRLC’s
congressional scorecard for the 111th Congress would record votes in
opposition to the Stupak Amendment as negative. Additionally, any
votes of “present” would also be recorded as anti-life
votes. Any representative concerned about his or her NRLC rating was
pressured to vote for the amendment despite it being fraught with
problems. In the meantime, a half dozen lobbyists for the USCCB joined
negotiators in Speaker Pelosi’s office to finalize a deal on support
for the health care bill.</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="91" jquery1258119665334="91"
jquery1258074943308="91" jquery1258073895467="91"
jquery1258072894702="95" align="left">As widely reported in the media,
the Stupak Amendment allowed
approximately 40 pro-life representatives to give the appearance of
supporting pro-life protections without sacrificing the major
components of
the "Pelosicare" bill. Without the aggressive lobbying efforts
of NRLC and the USCCB, it is altogether probable that H.R. 3962 would
not
have passed the House. Had H.R. 3962 failed, none of the anti-life
provisions included in the legislation would have been carried to the
U.S.
Senate in its current form. </p>
<p jquery1258392831859="92" jquery1258119665334="92"
jquery1258074943308="92" jquery1258073895467="92"
jquery1258072894702="96" align="left"><u>Is this divisive to the
pro-life movement?<br>
</u>The
truth sometimes is divisive. It is time for the pro-life movement to
unite
behind principles with the knowledge that pro-lifers now constitute 51
percent of the population. We must reject all manner of political games
that undermine the dignity of the human person. Taking this position
may be defined by some as divisive, but it is the correct position to
take
and the only one that will result in actually protecting the personhood
of
those we claim to represent.</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="93" jquery1258119665334="93"
jquery1258074943308="93" jquery1258073895467="93"
jquery1258072894702="97" align="left">The NRLC has a long history of
compromising where there need
not be compromise and misleading millions of convicted pro-lifers into
believing that abortion-enabling provisions and strategies are
necessary to
combat abortion. The pro-life movement remains united; whether the
NRLC remains united to the grassroots is debatable.</p>
<p jquery1258392831859="94" jquery1258119665334="94"
jquery1258074943308="94" jquery1258073895467="94"
jquery1258072894702="98" align="left"><u>Is this uncharitable?<br>
</u>No. What is uncharitable is
passing off a compromised amendment that undermines the dignity of the
human person as a “victory” for vulnerable human beings.
Charity means not compromising with evil. The pro-life movement cannot
make
progress toward the goal of recognizing the personhood of every human
being if we are not willing to proclaim truth and stand for
uncompromising
principles.</p>
<br>
<hr size="2" width="100%"><span
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial;"><b>Senate Dems Plan for
Floor Fight on Abortion Coverage in Health Reform
Bill<br>
</b><a href="http://ss.all.org/link.php?M=18096&N=493&L=3522&F=H">http://www.nationalpartnership.org/site/News2?abbr=daily2_&page=NewsArticle&id=21907&security=1201&news_iv_ctrl=-1</a><br>
<span style="font-size: 8pt;"><font color="#808080">National
Partnership
for Women and Families<br>
</font></span>Senate Democrats are preparing
for a fight over abortion coverage when floor debate begins on the
chamber's version of health care reform legislation, CQ Today reports.
According to CQ Today, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (D-Nev.)
version
of the bill, which is yet to be released, is not likely to include
restrictions on abortion coverage that will be strong enough to satisfy
antiabortion-rights members. Sens. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and Ben Nelson
(D-Neb.) said they have not decided if they will offer an antiabortion
amendment to Reid's bill. Nelson on Tuesday said, "I think the Hyde
Amendment is fairly clear and it ought to be carried over into any
legislation here." He added that the "question of how you do it is of
course going to be open. That'll probably be a big debate on the floor."<br>
<br>
<b>Hodari Abortion Clinic up for Sale as Lawsuit Ongoing</b><br>
<a href="http://ss.all.org/link.php?M=18096&N=493&L=3523&F=H">http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/nov/09111109.html</a><br>
<span style="font-size: 8pt;"><font color="#808080">Life Site News<br>
</font></span>At least one abortion clinic owned by abortionist Alberto
Hodari in Flint, Michigan is now up for sale. Flint Right to Life
president Judy Climer told LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) that she spotted the
sign
advertising the Feminine Health Care Clinic building at 2032 S. Saginaw
St.
for rent when she arrived to pray at the site today. <br>
</span>
<p jquery1258151235488="85" align="left"><small><strong>Planned
Parenthood and
ACLU Sue to block personhood initiative<br>
</strong><a href="http://ss.all.org/link.php?M=14770&N=496&L=3545&F=H">http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/nov/09111302.html</a><br>
<span style="font-size: 8pt;"><font color="#808080">Life Site News<br>
</font></span>Planned Parenthood (PP) and the American Civil Liberties
Union (ACLU) have filed a lawsuit against the sponsors of a Nevada
ballot
initiative that would explicitly define "person" as pertaining to all
human
beings, including the unborn. The ACLU and PP filed the challenge this
week
in Carson City District Court on behalf of feminist blogger Emmily
Bristol,
physician Dr. William Ramos, and pharmacist Mindy Hsu. The lawsuit
claims the initiative violates state law by not explicitly stating the
possible effects of the amendment on the legal status of abortion,
emergency contraception, and fertility treatment.</small></p>
<p jquery1258151235488="86" align="left"><small><b>Cape Cod abortion
buzz
baseless<br>
</b><a href="http://ss.all.org/link.php?M=14770&N=496&L=3544&F=H">http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=765278</a><br>
<span style="font-size: 8pt;"><font color="#808080">One News Now<br>
</font></span>The National Abortion Rights Action League's (NARAL) plea
that five abortion clinics in Cape Cod have been closed because of the
pro-life movement is not true. Anne Fox of <a target="_blank"
href="http://ss.all.org/link.php?M=14770&N=496&L=3549&F=H"
title="Massachusetts Citizens for Life">Massachusetts Citizens for
Life</a> says the story which has shown up in three newspaper blogs
generated by the abortion group, complaining that Cape Cod is now
undeserved for abortions, is bogus.</small> </p>
<font color="#3333ff"><big><big><font face="Calisto MT"><small><small><font
color="#000000"><br>
</font></small></small></font></big></big></font>
<hr size="2" width="100%"><font face="Calisto MT">PFLI
PharmAid Center<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:pfli@pfli.org">pfli@pfli.org</a><br>
PO Box 1281<br>
Powell, OH 43065-1281 USA</font><font face="Calisto MT"><br>
800-227-8359</font><font face="Calisto MT"><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="http://www.pfli.org">www.pfli.org</a>
</font><br>
<p><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="%3Cform%20action=%22https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr%22%20method=%22post%22%3E,%3Cinput%20type=%22hidden%22%20name=%22cmd%22%20value=%22_s-xclick%22%3E,%3Cinput%20type=%22image%22%20src=%22https://www.paypal.com/en_US/i/btn/x-click-butcc-donate.gif%22%20border=%220%22%20name=%22submit%22%20alt=%22Make%20payments%20with%20PayPal%20-%20it%27s%20fast,%20free%20and%20secure%21%22%3E,%3Cinput%20type=%22hidden%22%20name=%22encrypted%22%20value=%22-----BEGIN%20PKCS7-----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
%0A%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
AYD%0AVQQ%0AHEw1Nb3VudGFpbiBWaWV3MRQwEgYDVQQKEwtQYXlQYWwgSW5jLjETMBEGA1UECxQKbGl2ZV9jZXJ0czERMA8GA1UEAxQIbGl2ZV9hcGkxHDAaBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWDXJlQHBheXBhbC5jb22CAQAwDAYDVR0TBAUwAwEB/zANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQCBXzpWmoBa5e9fo6ujionW1hUhPkOBakTr3YCDjbYfvJEiv/2P+IobhOGJr85+XHhN0v4gUkEDI8r2/rNk1m0GA8HKddvTjyGw/XqXa+LSTlDYkqI8OwR8GEYj4efEtcRpRYBxV8KxAW93YDWzFGvruKnnLbDAF6VR5w/cCMn5hzGCAZowggGWAgEBMIGUMIGOMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzELMAkGA1UECBMCQ0ExFjAUBgNVBAcTDU1vdW50YWluIFZpZXcxFDASBgNVBAoTC1BheVBhbCBJbmMuMRMwEQYDVQQLFApsaXZlX2NlcnRzMREwDwYDVQQDFAhsaXZlX2FwaTEcMBoGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYNcmVAcGF5cGFsLmNvbQIBADAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoF0wGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDUxMDE1MTMwMDQ0WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUffWEvKx+dRuoUbj/1JzdUsifmMMwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYAu8n3eM94Q9Ta1JzS3FJsXA/k61ZE+06w6C1NlDAIZsTljtdyhpTFe8GQ0OcwijWE96gE/HZtj8GzytiBX0qpRrGSNbiVBLzva6+9N3LdKjHIzCBh5YxCOMAlXDRyxjsX0SfhRHDYOw+sy9ZlRveGv+UjsUyft1dU3ywKy+Sk+KQ==-----END%20PKCS7-----,%22%3E,%3C/form%3E"><br>
<img alt="" src="cid:part2.09010704.02030701@pfli.org" height="44"
width="73"></a><br>
</p>
<p><font color="#3333ff"><big><big><font face="Calisto MT"><small><small><font
color="#000000">PFLI supports
pharmacist rights of conscience NOT
to be forced to dispense or counsel for chemicals which violate their
sincerely held religious, moral or ethical beliefs. For more info see:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.pfli.org/main.php?pfli=conscienceclausefaq">http://www.pfli.org/main.php?pfli=conscienceclausefaq</a></font></small></small></font></big></big></font></p>
<p><small>*** PFLI is the only pharmacy association which is
exclusively
pro-life.
<br>
It represents thousands of pharmacists and many lay supporters
<br>
in the USA, Canada and all around the globe. For membership info, key
<br>
PFLI texts, PFLI archives, late-breaking news, abridged newsletter
excerpts
<br>
or general information, visit the PFLI web site at <a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.pfli.org">http://www.pfli.org</a>.
<br>
Or e-mail us at <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:pfli@pfli.org">mailto:pfli@pfli.org</a>.
</small></p>
<p><small>*** We do NOT send out SPAM. To subscribe to PharmFacts
E-News, just send an e-mail
with the
word
<br>
"subscribe" in the subject area or better yet, just enroll right from
our main news page at<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.pfli.org">http://www.pfli.org</a>; to cease your
subscription [although
we can't
<br>
imagine anyone would!] self-manage your account at:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://pfli.org/mailman/listinfo/pflienews_pfli.org">http://pfli.org/mailman/listinfo/pflienews_pfli.org</a><br>
</small></p>
<p><small>*** You may contact PFLI at any/all of the following:
Pharmacists
For
Life International,
<br>
PO Box 1281, Powell, OH 43065-1281 USA, 1-800-227-8359 [US &
Canada only],
<br>
+1-740-881-5520 [voice] or +1-740-206-1260 [fax]; e-mail us at
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:pfli@pfli.org">mailto:pfli@pfli.org</a>.
<br>
</small></p>
<p><small>*** You can order our publications as well as begin/renew
your
membership
or donate right on our
<br>
secure website at <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.pfli.org">http://www.pfli.org/shop</a>.
Click
on the "PFLI Store" link on the toolbar and
<br>
follow the prompts!
There you can also donate to PFLI as well as purchase a wide range of
publications. </small></p>
<font color="#3333ff"><b><big><big><font face="Calisto MT">
</font></big></big></b></font><br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<img src="cid:part3.02020301.00080108@pfli.org" border="0"></div>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<img src="cid:part4.02040709.00090208@pfli.org" border="0"></div>
<br>
</body>
</html>